Measuring performance is a difficult task. All the benchmarks on this page are
synthetic in the sense that they test one function repeatedly. Measurements in
live systems are much harder to produce reliably. So take the following data
with a grain of salt. That being said, a stated feature of the
*sortedcontainers Module* is performance so it would be negligent
not to produce this page with comparisons.

The source for all benchmarks can be found under the “tests” directory in the files prefixed “benchmark.” Measurements are made from the min, max, and average of 5 repetitions. In the graphs below, the line follows the average and at each point, the min/max displays the bounds. Note that the axes are log-log so properly reading two different lines would describe one metric as “X times” faster rather than “X seconds” faster. In all graphs, lower is better. Measurements are made by powers of ten: 10, 100, 1,000, 10,000, and 100,000.

Measurements up to 100,000,000 elements have been successfully tested but are impractical for publishing. Only a couple implementations (including sortedcontainers) are capable of handling so many elements. The major limiting factor at that size is memory. Consider the simple case of storing Python’s integers in a SortedList. Each integer object requires ~36 bytes so a hundred million elements will require about four gigabytes of memory. If the implemenation adds significant overhead then most systems will run out of memory. For all datasets which may be kept in memory, sortedcontainers is an excellent choice.

A good effort has been made to find competing implementations. Six in total were found with various list, set, and dict implementations.

- rbtree
- Provides a fast, C-implementation for dict and set data types. rbtree on PyPI
- blist
- Provides list, dict, and set containers based on the blist data-type. Implemented in Python and C. blist on PyPI
- treap
- Uses Cython for improved performance and provides a dict container. treap on PyPI
- bintrees
- Provides several tree-based implementations for dict and set containers. Fastest were AVL and Red-Black trees. Extends the conventional API to provide set operations for the dict type. Implemented in C. bintrees on PyPI
- banyan
- Provides a fast, C-implementation for dict and set data types. Offers some features also found in sortedcontainers like accessing the n-th item in a set or dict. banyan on PyPI
- skiplistcollections
- Pure-Python implementation based on skip-lists providing a limited-API for dict and set types. skiplistcollections on PyPI

Several competing implementations were omitted because they were not easily installable or failed to build.

- rbtree from NewCenturyComputers
- Pure-Python tree-based implementation. Not sure when this was last updated. Unlikely to be fast. rbtree from NewCenturyComputers
- python-avl-tree from Github user pgrafov
- Pure-Python tree-based implementation. Last updated 3 years ago. Unlikely to be fast. python-avl-tree from Github user pgrafov
- pyavl
- C-implementation for AVL tree-based dict and set containers. Claims to be fast. Last updated in 2012. Lacking documentation and failed to build on Windows. pyavl on PyPI

The most similar module to sortedcontainers is skiplistcollections given that each is implemented in Python. But as is displayed below, sortedcontainers is several times faster and provides a richer API. Often the pure-Python implementation in sortedcontainers is faster even than the C-implementation counterparts. Where it lacks, performance is generally on the same magnitude.

Because sortedcontainers is implemented in pure-Python, its performance depends directly on the Python runtime. SortedContainers was primarily developed, tested and benchmarked on CPython 2.7, specifically build:

```
Python 2.7 (r27:82525, Jul 4 2010, 09:01:59) [MSC v.1500 32 bit (Intel)] on
win32
```

Therefore, for each benchmark below two graphs are shown. The first compares the performance of sortedcontainers running on CPython 2.7 against competing implementations. The second displays a performance comparison of sortedcontainers running on the CPython 2.7, CPython 3.4 and PyPy 2.2 runtimes. In general CPython 3.4 is about half the speed of CPython 2.7. The PyPy 2.2 runtime displays much more variability due to its JIT-ed nature. Once the just-in-time compiler optimizes the code, performance is often several to tens of times faster.

A couple final notes about the graphs below. Missing data indicates the benchmark either took too long or failed. The set operations with tiny, small, medium, and large variations indicate the size of the container involved in the right-hand-side of the operation: tiny is exactly 10 elements; small is 10% of the size of the left-hand-side; medium is 50%; and large is 100%. The sortedcontainers module uses a different algorithm based on the size of the right-hand-side of the operation for a dramatic improvement in performance.

Graphs comparing *SortedList* performance.

Randomly adding values using *SortedList.add*.

Randomly testing membership using *SortedList.__contains__*.

Counting objects at random using *SortedList.count*.

Deleting objects at random using *SortedList.__delitem__*.

Retrieving ojbects by index using *SortedList.__getitem__*.

Finding the index of an object using *SortedList.index*.

Iterating a SortedList using *SortedList.__iter__*.

Removing the last object using *SortedList.pop*.

Remove an object at random using *SortedList.remove*.

Updating a SortedList using *SortedList.update*.

Graphs comparing *SortedDict* performance.

Given a key at random, retrieve the value using *SortedDict.__getitem__*.

Given a key at random, set the value using *SortedDict.__setitem__*.

Given a key at random, delete the value using *SortedDict.__delitem__*.

Iterate the keys of a SortedDict using *SortedDict.__iter__*.

Given an existing key at random, set the value using *SortedDict.__setitem__*.

Graphs comparing *SortedSet* performance.

Randomly add values using *SortedSet.add*.

Randomly test membership using *SortedSet.__contains__*.

Set difference using *SortedSet.difference*.

Set difference using *SortedSet.difference*.

Set difference using *SortedSet.difference*.

Set difference using *SortedSet.difference*.

Set difference using *SortedSet.difference_update*.

Set difference using *SortedSet.difference_update*.

Set difference using *SortedSet.difference_update*.

Set difference using *SortedSet.difference_update*.

Set intersection using *SortedSet.intersection*.

Set intersection using *SortedSet.intersection*.

Set intersection using *SortedSet.intersection*.

Set intersection using *SortedSet.intersection*.

Set intersection using *SortedSet.intersection_update*.

Set intersection using *SortedSet.intersection_update*.

Set intersection using *SortedSet.intersection_update*.

Set intersection using *SortedSet.intersection_update*.

Iterating a set using *iter(SortedSet)*.

Remove the last item in a set using *SortedSet.pop*.

Remove an item at random using *SortedSet.remove*.

Set union using *SortedSet.union*.

Set union using *SortedSet.union*.

Set union using *SortedSet.union*.

Set union using *SortedSet.union*.

Set update using *SortedSet.update*.

Set update using *SortedSet.update*.

Set update using *SortedSet.update*.

Set update using *SortedSet.update*.

Set symmetric-difference using *SortedSet.symmetric_difference*.

Set symmetric-difference using *SortedSet.symmetric_difference*.

Set symmetric-difference using *SortedSet.symmetric_difference*.

Set symmetric-difference using *SortedSet.symmetric_difference*.

Set symmetric-difference using *SortedSet.symmetric_difference_update*.

Set symmetric-difference using *SortedSet.symmetric_difference_update*.

Set symmetric-difference using *SortedSet.symmetric_difference_update*.

Set symmetric-difference using *SortedSet.symmetric_difference_update*.